I recently finished the book “Chariots and Horses” and the book was very thought-provoking on both a rowing level and a coaching level. One of the main themes of the book is how the rower/coach (author) goes from practicing the “battlefield approach” to his training/racing and transforms into a more “soft” (as he calls it) approach. This soft approach is more or less a process-driven approach in that it focuses on trying your best daily and when a race comes, you do your best and see what happens. It isn’t about killing your opponent (figuratively) or going to war with the other teams. This approach is more of a results-driven mentality.
Similar to an earlier post, I am attaching a poll here to see what your responses are like on this matter. My answer and reasoning are below. Again, I do not claim to be a rowing expert, just my two cents on what I find to work with my teams and my past experiences.
After completing the book and considering what side of the spectrum I fell on as a coach, I found it interesting that I, like the author, switched when I went to coaching. As an athlete, every practice was a chance for me to go to battle with someone on my team. If we were doing an erg workout, I would pick another guy, and I would do everything I could to make sure he finished after I did. In seat racing, it was the same thing. “Go ahead, line me up across from someone and see what happens” was a typical thought running through my head at practice. While “useful” when I rowed in college, I realized that as a coach, it wasn’t right or fair to put that much pressure on a crew. I did it to myself as an athlete, but as a coach (especially a novice girls’ coach) the constant reminder that if you don’t win you have failed, makes rowing much more intense on the mind than it has to be. Sure rowing is hard, no question there. But why make it that much more difficult by being results-driven? Deep down, very few coaches would be upset with winning gold medals or shirts or trophies. I know I take great pride when my rowers are able to accomplish that feat for themselves and the program. But always focusing on the results, takes the focus off of what really matters–the process. Getting to the finals at Nationals isn’t going to occur on its own, and having the rowers focus on the daily process and what they can do to impact that progress, in my eyes, is what makes a good crew great. I have seen plenty of programs harp on “we need to win this race to make a statement” and then when they come in second place, the only statement being made is the throwing of oars, sour faces, and ultimate disappointment. Let’s face it, in any given event, only 1 boat will win a gold medal. That’s it. 1 boat. So at Nationals where there might be 30-40 boats in an event, that is going to leave all but 1 with a sour face and disappointment, if they embody the “win at all costs” approach.
Many coaches/rowers/athletes would view this process-driven approach as too soft on the athletes. “Aww lets focus on feeling good and improving and butterflies and cupcakes”. I get it, and I don’t claim this is the one and only way to motivate and coach athletes. I just go off what has worked for me. I have tried the results oriented approach–uttering the word “win” hundreds of times in a season. Unless your crew can go undefeated in a season, which some are capable of that, then the results approach will inevitably lead to some negative reactions during and after a regatta. The process-driven approach rarely yields such a result. If the team buys into the mindset, then after a race, even one where the boat finished outside of medalling, the kids could be heard uttering “Coach, did you see that race? That was awesome. Our best one yet!” Conversely, in the results driven you only will ever hear two responses, “Coach, we won!” or “Coach, what the $*##, how did we lose?” Have fun answering the second question to a rower’s satisfaction.
Be Smart. Row Hard